4. California

A. Agency Overview

Management authority for coastal pelagic species is divided between the State of California and the Pacific Fishery Management Council (PFMC). The PFMC is responsible for jack mackerel (Trachurus symmetricus) north of 39o N latitude and northern anchovy (Engraulis mordax). CDFG is responsible for sardine (Sardinops sagax), chub mackerel (Scomber japonicus), and jack mackerel in the southern portion of their range. Market squid (Loligo opalescens) is often considered a coastal pelagic species, and supports a large California fishery which is also the responsibility of CDFG. In 1996, the PFMC amended the northern anchovy fishery management plan (FMP) to include sardine, chub mackerel and other species harvested by the California "wetfish" fleet. However, the new "Coastal Pelagic Species FMP" (CPS-FMP) was subsequently rejected by NMFS and therefore it was not implemented by the PFMC.

Stock assessments for coastal pelagic species are collaborative efforts involving CDFG and NMFS-SWFSC. An informal working agreement between agencies allows flexible, effective use of available expertise. NMFS-SWFSC technical expertise in icthyoplankton surveys, population dynamics and modeling provides a major contribution to management of these fisheries.

Management authority for sardine, chub mackerel and market squid in California rests with the state legislature, which establishes guidelines and directives. Adopted legislation is codified and given regulatory authority in the Fish and Game Code (Code). CDFG is responsible for conducting stock assessments, making management recommendations, and enforcement. Harvest guidelines and annual quotas for sardine and chub mackerel are based on results of periodic stock assessments. CDFG is given considerable latitude in recommending sardine quotas, with a stated management goal of rehabilitating the resource while maximizing the sustained harvest. In contrast, management policy for chub mackerel is much more narrowly defined in the Code. The primary goal of chub mackerel management is to maintain the biomass above 18,000 mt, which by inference addresses issues of overfishing and ecosystem interactions. A specific harvest formula is given in the Code for establishing annual chub mackerel fishing quotas based on current biomass. Currently, there are no major restrictions on the market squid fishery although CDFG is beginning to re-address contemporary research and management issues.

The PFMC adopted the northern anchovy FMP in 1978. NMFS is responsible for anchovy stock assessment and harvest recommendations.

Integrated stock assessment models are employed to estimate biomass and fishery selectivities for sardine and chub mackerel. Port sampling is conducted by CDFG in southern California and Monterey to obtain biological data and estimates of catch-at-age. Coastal pelagic stocks are transboundary, supporting fisheries in the EEZ of Mexico and the United States. The primary fishing port for coastal pelagic species in Baja California is Ensenada. Statistical and biological data are available for the Ensenada fisheries from the Instituto Nacional de la Pesca (INP). Several kinds of fishery independent data are used as tuning indices in the sardine and chub mackerel assessment models, including egg and larvae abundance (from California Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigations [CalCOFI] and other ad-hoc surveys) and fish school observations by commercial spotter pilots. Assessment models use environmental data (SST) in spawner-recruit relations to estimate abundance of new recruits. Sardine spawning biomass is estimated at irregular intervals using the Daily Egg Production Method. An index of chub mackerel abundance for older fish is available from sportfishing logbooks (i.e.: southern California Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel [CPFV] fleet).

 

B. Assessment and Management by Species

  1. Sardine

    The biomass of sardine (age one and older) off California and northern Baja California was estimated to have been about 463,000 mt (CV 44% and 95% confidence interval from 260,000 to 997,000 mt ) on July 1, 1996. That estimate was based on output from a stock assessment model called CANSAR.

    For the first time, biomass estimates from CANSAR were compared to biomass estimates from two other stock assessment models (Virtual Population Analysis or VPA and an age structured model without catch at age data). Results from all three models were similar, although there was considerable uncertainty in biomass estimates for recent years.

    Questions about stock structure and distribution were major sources of uncertainty in the sardine assessment. Recent data show increased sardine abundance in the Pacific Northwest off the Columbia River and as far north as British Columbia, but it was not possible to determine if those fish were part of the stock available to the California fishery and whether the biomass of sardine in northern areas was included in estimates from the models. Similar questions exist about sardine in Mexican waters south of Ensenada. These problems were confounded by the fact that survey and fishery data which were mostly collected within the Southern California Bight. Additional information is needed to resolve these questions because different modeling approaches gave similar results.

    Estimates of sardine spawning biomass were available in 1986, 1987, 1988, 1994, 1995 and 1996 based on the Daily Egg Production Method (DEPM). Prior to 1994, spawning habitat was confined to waters south of Point Conception, where egg and adult data were collected. For those earlier years, survey coverage probably encompassed the geographic limit of spawning activity. Since 1994, spawning habitat has expanded as far north as the Pacific northwest. However, most adult fish data (spawning frequency, batch fecundity, mean female weight) were still from specimens collected off southern California or nearshore in the Monterey area. There is evidence of clines in growth rate and age composition based on latitude and distance from shore. Since female reproductive parameters vary with size and age, DEPM estimates in recent years may be biased due to the lack of adult fish samples from northern and offshore waters. Also, it is likely that surveys of spawning area since 1994 have not encompassed the northern limit of spawning habitat, which would result in underestimation of spawning biomass.

    A harvest formula originally selected as the preferred option in the draft CPS-FMP was used by CDFG to calculate fishing quotas during 1996 and 1997. Using that formula and the 1996 estimate of biomass, a quota of 49,000 mt was established for the 1997 California fishery.

  2. Chub Mackerel

    The California fishery for chub mackerel has declined precipitously since 1990. Statewide landings during 1996 continued the downward trend, and totaled only 10,300 mt. During the last few years, the principal cause of reduced catches has been low biomass and poor availability on the traditional fishing grounds in southern California waters. Cannery closures since 1993 may have also affected demand.

    Several sources of information were available on the status of the chub mackerel stock, all of which suggest a decline in biomass compared to the late 1970's and 1980's. Landing statistics were available since 1978 for both the U.S. and Mexican fisheries, and both fleets show reduced catches during recent years. Catch rates for the CPFV fleet have also shown declining trends since the 1970's. Other fishery-independent data from aerial observations (spotter pilots) and plankton surveys (CalCOFI mackerel larvae samples) indicated lower abundance compared to the early 1980's.

    A tuned virtual population analysis (VPA) model called ADEPT was used to estimate chub mackerel biomass. The model finds the best statistical fit between fishery-based, age-structured biomass estimates and other data from the aerial observations, plankton surveys, CPFV catch data, and a spawner-recruit relation.

    Based on the estimated number of fish in each year class during the last quarter of 1995 (including the 1995 year class), and using certain assumptions for expected fishing mortality during the first half of 1996, chub mackerel biomass was projected to be 47,000 mt at the beginning of the 1996/97 fishing season, on July 1, 1996. There is a large degree of uncertainty in the 1996 biomass estimate because the 1995 year class (fish of age one) comprised most of the biomass.

    The harvest formula for chub mackerel specifies that when biomass is between 18,000 and 136,000 mt, the season's quota shall be 30 percent of the total biomass in excess of 18,000 mt. Using that formula and the biomass projection for July 1, 1996, a commercial fishery quota of 8,700 mt was established for the 1996/97 California fishing season.

 

C. Other Related Studies

  1. Sardine

    For several years, priority has been given to acquiring data from north of the Southern California Bight, and much of those data were used in the most recent sardine assessment. Since 1990, four sardine icthyoplankton surveys were conducted in waters north of Point Conception. Unfortunately, it was not possible to incorporate data from the two northernmost surveys in the most recent assessment. The 1995 CDFG survey was conducted during August, which proved to be too late in the season to detect sardine spawning that year. One of the 1994 NMFS surveys found sardine spawning off Oregon, but it was not determined whether those fish were part of the stock available to California fishermen, and so the findings were not used in the California assessment. Another sardine survey (including standard icthyoplankton sampling, CUFES, trawl sampling for adults, and a test of airborne LIDAR for school detection) was conducted by NMFS during the spring of 1997.

    Fishery sampling was also extended to the north in recent years, in response to increased abundance of sardine. CDFG commenced sampling of the Monterey directed fishery in 1996, and the size-at-age data were used in the most recent sardine stock assessment. Two other promising sources of fishery data became available during 1996. The Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission began funding a multi-year study to collect and analyze sardine and chub mackerel data from Pacific northwest whiting bycatch during 1996; and the Canadian Department of Fisheries and Oceans collected samples from an experimental sardine fishery in British Columbia during 1996 (D. Ware, Pacific Biological Station, Nanaimo, B.C., pers. comm.). Geographic stratification in CANSAR is presently limited to separate selectivity parameters for Mexican and California fisheries. When sufficient data become available from the new northern sources (including the Monterey fishery), further geographic stratification will be investigated.

    Uncertainties in the sardine assessment emphasize the importance of recent efforts to obtain new data as sardine range has extended to the north. As additional data are obtained from these and other sources, assessment precision will improve.

  2. Chub Mackerel

    Historically, chub mackerel spawning grounds have been centered off the coast of northern and central Baja California with juvenile and adult fish moving northward into the Southern California Bight, where they are targeted by the California directed fishery.

    CDFG conducted an icthyoplankton survey in the summer of 1996 to determine the extent and intensity of chub mackerel spawning in waters off Baja California. Icthyoplankton and biomass data from 1951-1966, when CalCOFI plankton surveys routinely extended into Baja California waters, suggest that larval density in Baja California waters is correlated with spawning biomass. Data from the 1996 research cruise will be used in the 1997 chub mackerel stock assessment.

 

D. Coastal Pelagic Species Publications by CDFG, 1994-1997

Arenas, P., J.T. Barnes and L.D. Jacobson. 1994
Fishery and biological data for northern anchovy taken in Mexican waters, 1978-1989. U.S. Dep. Commer., NOAA, Nat. Mar. Fish. Serv., Southwest Fish. Sci. Cent., P.O. Box 271, La Jolla, CA 92038. Admin. Rep. LJ-94-03. 24p.

Barnes, J.T., and T.J. Foreman. 1994
Recent evidence for the formation of annual growth increments in the otoliths of Pacific sardines (Sardinops sagax). Calif. Fish and Game. (80)1:29-35.

Jacobson, L.D., N.C.H. Lo and J.T. Barnes. 1994
A biomass based assessment model for northern anchovy, Engraulis mordax. Fish. Bull., U.S. 92:711-724.

Barnes, J.T. and D.H. Hanan. 1995
Status of the Pacific mackerel resource and fishery, 1994 and 1995. Calif. Dept. Fish Game, MRD Admin. Rpt. 95-4. 20p.

Barnes, J.T., M. Yaremko and D.H. Hanan. 1996
Status of the Pacific sardine resource and fishery. Calif. Dept. Fish Game, MRD Admin. Rpt. 96-1. 22p.

Butler, J.L., M.L. Granados, J.T. Barnes, M. Yaremko and B.J. Macewicz. 1996
Age composition, growth and maturation of the Pacific sardine, Sardinops sagax, during 1994. Calif. Coop. Oceanic Fish. Invest. Rep. 37:152-159.

Deriso, R.B., J.T. Barnes, L.D. Jacobson and P.J. Arenas. 1996
Catch-at-age analysis for Pacific sardine (Sardinops sagax), 1983-1995. Calif. Coop. Oceanic Fish. Invest. Rep. 37:175-187.

Yaremko, M.L. 1996
Age determination in Pacific sardine, Sardinops sagax. NOAA Tech. Mem. NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-223. 32 p.

Barnes, J.T., M. Yaremko and T. Bishop. 1997
Status of the Pacific mackerel resource during 1996 and management recommendations for the fishery. Calif Dept. Fish Game, MRD Admin. Rpt. 97-2. 32p.

Barnes, J.T., M. Yaremko, L. Jacobson, N.C.H. Lo and J. Stehly. 1997
Status of the Pacific sardine (Sardinops sagax) resource in 1996. NOAA Tech. Mem. NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-237. 40p.

Hill, K.T. and J.T. Barnes. 1997
Historical catch data from California’s commercial passenger fishing vessel fleet: status and comparison of two sources. Calif. Dept. Fish and Game, MRD Tech. Rep. 47p.